49 suppliers rated31 with public certificates7 FDA warning letters trackedUpdated October 2026 · How ratings work
Rated Peptides
7 letters · 8 closed · 5 unverified

Suppliers to avoid, or at least think twice about

Out of the 62 storefronts we track, these are the ones with a public regulatory letter, a closed shop, or a site we could not verify. Every row links to the primary source so you can check it yourself.

Public FDA warning letters (7)

A letter caps a supplier at 3.0 stars for as long as it is on the record. Suppliers that have also closed carry no rating.

SupplierLetter datedRead itStill trading?Our rating
NuScience Peptidesnusciencepeptides.com2026-08-24fda.govYes2.8/5
PureRawzpurerawz.co2025-09-08fda.govYes2.1/5
Xcel Peptidesxcelpeptides.com2024-12-10fda.govYes2.1/5
Swiss Chemsswisschems.is2024-12-10fda.govYes3.0/5
Prime Peptidesprimepeptides.co2024-12-10fda.govYes3.0/5
Umbrella Labsumbrellalabs.is2021-05-18fda.govYes3.0/5
Paradigm Peptidesparadigmpeptides.com2020-12-07fda.govClosedNot rated

Editorial ratings, not user reviews.

Closed storefronts (8)

Could not be verified (5)

Warning signs we watch for

Paperwork
  • No certificate of analysis anywhere, or one undated "sample" certificate copied across the whole range.
  • A certificate with no laboratory name, or a laboratory that only exists on the supplier's own site.
  • A footer that says "mass-spec verified" when the posted certificates show something else.
The company
  • No business name, address or phone; only a contact form.
  • A trust-site profile that was taken down for breaking the platform's rules.
  • Checkout limited to payment methods you cannot reverse: crypto, wire, peer-to-peer apps.
The marketing
  • Product pages making health claims while the footer says "research use only".
  • Review counts shown on the storefront with no platform you can visit to read them.
The record
  • A public FDA warning letter, whatever the supplier's reply.
  • A domain that recently changed hands or now redirects to a different brand.

Questions buyers ask

What is an FDA warning letter, in plain terms?

It is a public letter in which the US Food and Drug Administration tells a company it believes the company is breaking the law, usually naming specific products and web pages. It is not a court ruling, and the company can reply and keep trading. We record the date and link straight to the letter on fda.gov so you can read it yourself.

If a supplier has a letter, are its products bad?

The letter does not tell you that. In this category the letters mostly deal with how products are described and marketed. We treat one as a serious mark against a supplier because it is public, dated and written by a regulator, and because it caps the rating at 3.0 stars, not because we have tested anything.

Why list suppliers that have closed?

Because old forum threads and comparison lists still send people to them. A clear "closed" page with a date stops a reader from paying a dead storefront, or whoever picked up the domain afterwards.

What does "could not verify" mean?

The site was offline, redirected somewhere unrelated, or showed nothing we could check when we looked. We do not rate those suppliers and we suggest you treat them as unknown until something changes.